lthms' avatar, a hand drawing looking person, wearing a headset, close to a window on a raining night
Thomas Letan
lthms · he/him

Did you come across something which caught your attention? Don’t hesitate to shoot me an email in my public inbox.

 Published on

How I Keep Using Stacked Git at $WORK

One year ago, I have published an article summarizing my experience using Stacked Git at $WORK. Twelve months later, enough has changed to motivate a spin-off piece.

Stacked Git is Fast

Firstly, it is important to state that my main complaint about Stacked Git is now a thing of the pastFor fairness, I have removed the related section in my previous write-up. ! Stacked Git does not feel slow anymore, and far from it. This is because Stacked Git 2.0 has been rewritten in Rust . While RiiR (Rewrite it in Rust) is a running meme on the Internet, in this particular case, the result is very exciting.

Thanks to the performance boost, my Zsh prompt does not take 0.1s to appear!

Speaking of Zsh prompt, basically what I ended up displaying is (<TOP PATCH NAME> <APPLIED PATCHES COUNT>/<PATCHSET SIZE> <HIDDEN PATCHES COUNT). For instance, (fix-1337 1/2 3).

In case you want to take inspiration in my somewhat working configuration, here is the snippet of interest.

local series_top="$(stg top 2> /dev/null)"
local total="$(stg series 2> /dev/null | wc -l)"
local hidden="$(stg series --hidden 2> /dev/null | wc -l)"

if [[ "${total}" -gt 0 ]]; then
    local not_applied="$(stg series | grep -E '^-' | wc -l)"
    local applied="$(($total - $not_applied))"

    if [[ -z "${series_top}" ]]; then

    echo -n "(${status_color}${series_top} ${applied}/${total} ${hidden})"
    echo -n "  ($(current_branch))"

Branchless Workflow

Last year, I was using Stacked Git on top of git branches. More precisely, I had one branch for each (stack of) Merge Request. It worked well, because my typical MR counted 3 to 4 commits in average.

Fast forward today, and things have changed on this front too. In a nutshell, I have become a “one commit per MR” maximalist of sortIt goes without saying that this approach comes with its set of drawbacks too. During the past year, I’ve pushed fairly large commits which could have been split into several smaller ones, for the sake of keeping my “one commit per MR” policy. I have also had to manage large stacks of MRs. . I find this approach very effective to get more focused reviews, and to reduce the time it takes for a given MR to be integrated into the main branch.

My previous approach based on git branches did not scale well with this new mindset, and during the course of the year, I stopped using branches altogetherI have not invented the branchless workflow, of course. After it was first published, someone posted a link to my Stacked Git article on Hacker News, and @arxanas posted a comment about git-branchless . I tried the tool, and even if it never clicked for me, I was really compelled by its core ideas. Similarly, Drew DeVault has published a complete article on its own branchless workflow in 2020 . .

These days, I proceed as follows.

  1. I name each patch after the branch to which I will push it on our upstream Git remote.
  2. 99% of the time, I push my work using git push -f upstream @:$(stg top)
  3. I created a small git plugin I called git-prepare which allows me to select one of the patch of my current patchset using fzf, and which pops all other patches that are currently applied.

git-prepare is really straightforward:

patch=$(stg series -P | fzf)

if [[ ! $? -eq 0 ]] ; then
    exit $?

if [ -n "$(stg series -A)" ]; then
    stg pop -a

stg push ${patch}

The main hurdle which I still need to figure out is how to deal with stacked MRs. Currently, this is very manual. I need to remember which commit belongs to the stack, the order and dependencies of these commits, and I need to publish each commit individually using stg push; git push @:$(stg top).

The pragmatic answer is definitely to come back to git branches for this particular use case, but it's not the fun answer. So from time to time, I try to experiment with alternative approaches. My current intuition is that, by adopting a naming convention for my patches, I could probably implement a thin tooling on top of Stacked Git to deal with dependents commits.


Putting aside stacked MRs for now, I am really satisfied with my workflow. It’s very lightweight and intuitive, and working without Stacked Git now feels backward and clunky.

So I will take this opportunity to thank one more time Stacked Git’s authors and contributors. You all are making my professional like easier with your project.